Home (Summary view) | List view

New skills for the current generation?


One hears off and on about kids these days not learning cursive hand-writing well these days, or schools not placing much emphasis on hand-writing at all. Ditto for lack of emphasis on spelling.

"Let kids focus on the creative aspects of writing without getting bogged down by details such as spelling and handwriting, especially when they have to turn in the final version typed out in Word which has a spell-checker" is the view adopted by several urban, progressive schools where children use word processors like MS Word.

Is this view justified? If I look at my own lifestyle today - I cannot think of the last time I hand wrote a letter or document! Fast forward 10 years from now - will our next generation ever need to worry about hand-writing and spelling? Personally, I think not everyone uses a spell checker while typing emails and knowing the correct spellings of words in a language you're supposed to be fluent in, is necessary. I'm not convinced about the necessity for perfectly formed hand-written letters though.

Apart from skills that are "dying" so-to-speak, there are other skills that are creeping up as the new skills of the digital generation. I was wondering, would typing be something all kids should learn? Given that they will be using computers a LOT all their lives, should they not get out of the hunt-and-peck mode of typing with the 2 forefingers? Should all kids not be taught to type effortlessly so they can focus on the thinking rather than typing?

Would be nice to get others thoughts on this. What do English teachers think?

It shall take some time for this shift of priorities in several schools, and till then teachers continue take it upon themselves to insist on good handwriting and correct spellings. As we continue to instill effective creative writing skills, this too remains to be an important issue. The boards need to change the whole way exams are conducted, if this would be the case. We consistently check children to keep trying to write legibly, as so to learn their spellings well. To have our brains oiled well on this account is a good idea, Why do you think there are international spellingbee contests? We learn that children are ambidextrous when they are little, and then later the shift happens, tells us also about which hand the child writes with, later we start to insist on handwriting. To hold a childs hand to start making him write the alphabets or the 'akshar' in hindi or the other regional languages? What would we do? Bring the little one in front of a PC or laptop and make it look at the alphabets? We were told as children that a persons character is judged by his handwriting, books have been published on this. No there are too many reasons to prove handwriting and spellings are important in a childs learning years.

 Ofcourse I do not for a moment say that to teach typing to children so as to enable them to jab efficiently on their keyboards is not required. But to ignore these skills of handwriting and spelling? Absolutely not. Atleast not till exams which are held expect children to write reams and reams of stuff.

To emphasize the essential quality of writing well here is an article that tells us something to chew on:

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?id=16325eeb-7479-4116-b63d-e3672acb44e6

Interesting questions, drona. I'm honestly not sure there is a clear answer - there is evidence to support varying points of view, I think.

Varni, that article you linked to was very useful to give the developmental perspective of teaching writing. Reading the article also suggests that this is becoming an issue all over the world with increasing email and computer use by the current generation of children. Progressive schools which are not stressing good handwriting should probably think about the fact that exam papers are still hand-written, as Varni pointed out.

In the context of spelling, I think schools have to also fight this growing trend of what is known as sms-ese or sms-speak - which also carries over to emails among youngsters - e.g. ur for your, cud for could, and the commonly used 'u' (for you) etc. With the growing trend of 'scrapping' on orkut as well using this lingo, it appears that all written exchange outside of school for kids between 12-18 is conducted in this lingo.

I read an article somewhere a while ago that examiners in the UK were wondering what to do as this sms tongue is creeping into exam answers as well, and that they were actually considering not penalizing a student for such usage - which is a shame, (in my opinion) - but it also points to the fact that exam boards are actually looking at trends and adapting (for better or worse, is of course, debatable).

Just to toss one more question into the ring - Why can't board exams become computer-based? Or at least give the option of taking a paper test (for people who don't have access to a computer) or a computer-based one. It does mean a lot of work, but it can be done. If the idea is too far-fetched for Indian boards, I think it is well within the realm of possibility of the International Boards that conduct exams in India - IBO and CIE (IGCSE & AICE) - which probably have the resources and the wherewithall. The GRE, GMAT, SAT and other entrance exams for colleges and universities abroad have become computer-based (although they are mostly objective type questions - which lend themselves to being computer-based, but there are essay and written components as well).

You make a very compelling argument, Varni, about the importance of hand-writing - at least as long as exams are paper-pen based. But then, I don't know if one just needs to be legible or actually learn cursive (quite painstakingly, in some cases). 

Just teaching children how to write/print legibly should suffice, should it not? My point was not to eliminate learning to write altogether - which is developmentally necessary too - but was to question whether it was necessary to pay the kind of attention to fine penmanship that was paid in our days. The truth is that if we teach a skill for later life, then teaching perfect cursive hand-writing does seem like a bit of a waste of time to me. 

The article you linked to, was a great read, but I still think it is not so essential to teach all that convoluted looping of cursive...just teach children to print and write clearly.

Of course, as Shuchi points out, if board exams were to also become computer-based one day, then that reason also goes away ... but I guess that is not happening anytime soon, so until then, Varni's argument holds :) 

As a teacher my constant appeal to the children is to write legibly and neatly. As far as going into details and technicalities of cursive handwriting at a later stage need not be stressed upon, in my opinion. In the childs early years of starting to learn, why not teach since it is good for the overall development of the brain. Telling the children to 'package their product effectively', while handing over assignments or exams sheets, or simple classwork, helps, I found. And they do understand the agony of the teacher when she has to come across work, which is untidy, badly presented, illegibe and with atrocious spellings. That is if a teacher expresses the trouble one has to go to when such work is handed over. If such a resolution is passed where children could make a choice between typing and writing, then maybe, we could avoid insisting on spellings and handwriting. To me that seems to be a distant proposition, in India, as of now.

 In the article there is mention of trying to learn writing well, also because there are many for whom computers is still a dream. I too feel the same. One has to be in close touch with the grass roots and realities, or else it is just another step one takes from getting alieniating from reality.

Regarding using sms text in enlish formal writing in classes, well, I think we could take it as a change and not denounce it outright, as we cannot wish it away as we can see. Also, since nothing new was happening in english, after it had evolved to what it was till now, we could probably accept it, even if with a pinch of salt. A couple of viewpoints for you:

http://education.zdnet.com/?p=1021

http://education.guardian.co.uk/tefl/story/0,5500,956003,00.html

Those were some good thoughts to ponder upon. I am also looking at the focus, clarity and transparency that the teacher brings into the classroom in the form of stating learning objectives. While students are doing their initial draft, one of the learning objectives to be linked to creativity. The next draft could focus on spelling. This would ensure the inclusion of critical thinking skills and at the same time also focus on spelling and legibility at the next stage. This applies to all subjects and goes beyond just English.

The computer definitely helps in editing the written work and it would be great if students are allowed to use it. There is a scaffolding process taking place even with the use of computers for this process, so I feel there is a lot of learning happening while using the system for checking your written work. With every generation we find that they are more technologically forward than the next, little kids today learn their alphabets using the computer and other gadgets that did not exist earlier. The computer has also been of great help to children with specific learning disabilities. The board has also begun to make small steps of progress along these lines and may be in the future, we will find greater changes in the assessment procedures. These changes should aid students to enhance their critical thinking and at the same strike a right balance between creativity, spelling, handwriting……For instance, you could probably insist on one/two assignments that need to be hand written and focus being on legibility, rather than a particular kind of handwriting.

The other area to keep in mind is also the availability of computers to students across the country. Access to all would aid in focusing on a lot of the areas that have been discussed. The question being – when, where and how?