Home (Summary view) | List view

Grey areas of school admission policy- A search for new assessment ideas.


Grey areas of school admission policy- A search for new assessment ideas. 

As a parent and teacher this is an issue that has haunted me for the past 8 years. Do our pre- school students need a form of assessment that exists currently. Let’s put ourselves in the shoes of a 4 year old. They are expected to walk into an unfamiliar world and interact with strangers. How many adults themselves are comfortable in the midst of strangers?

 Why are we still clinging on to old traditions in an era that is replete with new thinking? I’m glad that at-least for the past 1-2 years there appears to have been a silent revolt. The government has also considered it as an area that needs rethinking and reform. Very often when this issue is discussed, the most common counter argument that one is faced with is ‘How else can we filter out and admit students from so many applicants? What is the alternative form of assessment? 

Have we as educationalists, parents, policy makers at government levels and common man given this adequate thought? Can we do something on our part to rid them of this unnecessary stress which is going to part of their future?

 

In order to answer this, we need to look at how a 4 year old perceives and understands the environment around them and possible experiences that they might have had in their previous years. Exploring these might be worthwhile in designing alternative forms of assessment.

 

Many education theories revolve around providing the child a safe environment. Thus it is essential to create an environment that the child feels safe to be part of. In order to achieve this, we need to keep in mind the design of the room/ environment that the child is going to be present. Elements like furniture, mats, carpet, arrangement of materials (puzzles, blocks… )

 

One of the first questions that my little daughter asked me on telling her about coming into school as part of her admission procedure was- Mama, will there be small mats that I can sit on and work? A thought that had never crossed my mind! But on hearing it, I was able to make the connection immediately. My mind and thoughts went back to her own Montessori class environment. It’s a room that does not have many chairs/ tables but other essential elements for a learning environment. However it has small mats that they treasure and are responsible for- from picking it, to opening and sitting on it for all activities and even take responsibility for placing it back in its original place. Even this seems to be far away from the reality of our assessment environments.

 An area to assess might be communication skills. Could we just listen in to conversations amongst children or with adults to gain an insight into their vocabulary? The focus of conversation being on questions or talk associated with their familiar zone of understanding like home, family, nature, previous or current school……This will give us an idea of their listening skills, ability to speak with clarity, interpret simple questions…They can even be asked to share a story that they have heard or create their own based on fantasy- which is a characteristic feature associated with children of this age. They can also be asked to act as their school teacher/ friend/ parent/ a pet / animal ……..- these would reflect their keen observation skills and creativity.   Another area to assess would be their motor skills and other related skills associated with activities involving physical tasks. 

Most children would have worked with puzzles, blocks of various sizes, Lego- material, shapes…. based on familiar objects or organisms in their environment. Amazingly you will find that most children will gravitate towards them. Besides, it also gives us a wonderful opportunity to get an idea of their level of curiosity, development of motor skills, problem solving skills, ability to follow and interpret simple instructions, sequencing skills…                

 

They could even have a range of fun activities involving some physical movements like dance to specific music, simple sports/ other activities (even just place ball, bat, dolls, cars, toy kitchen sets… ), drawing, colouring and cutting. These are suitable and familiar stimuli that are close to their heart and they would produce spontaneous responses that would act as indicators to aid assessment.

  

If schools can afford it, we can even minimize human unfamiliarity impact on their performance, thereby gaining an insight into their true potential. How do we accomplish this? After all we live in an age where many impossible things have been achieved through the use of appropriate technology. Is there a possibility of using cameras, tape recorders and other relevant gadgets….as tools to aid in obtaining data for assessment?  The parents/ accompanying familiar adult can be provided with a list of questions/ instructions and activities on entering the area/ place where the assessment is going to be performed.

 

All these would ensure less stress levels, place the child in a comfort zone area, cater to multiple intelligences and at the same time obtain an assessment that is more reliable and valid.

 

All these and many more new suggestions will definitely demand flexibility in thought- unlike possessing a set mind frame, more time and team work dedicated to design of admission assessment procedures, …..Are we prepared to invest in all these factors to transform the existing systems of assessment? It’s never too late to make a beginning, so that future generations can be spared of this trauma.

 

The more minds thinking about it, the better would be the results. Please add on thoughts and ideas that could be incorporated as a proposal for new admission procedures at this level.

 

That's a beautiful write-up. (Perhaps you'd like to copy it all here in your post - it is not that long and would be easier to access and read?)

I was reminded of the meeting Totto Chan had with the headmaster of the Tomoe - the "school in a train" in "Totto Chan - the Little Girl at the Window" (which I think is a must-read for anyone involved in education). I will post a link to the pdf of the book (on Arvind Gupta's website) or upload it here myself.

Need to rush now.. will write more on this thought-provoking piece...

I am looking forward to reading this book through the link.

What is the basis for assessing a 4-year old at all? Wouldn't assessing the parents suffice?

Exactly! I second that...

I wouldn't use the word 'assessing parents' as we are not intersted in getting the learning level/ skills or abilities of the parents. However, I would say that interviewing the parents would be an option that one can consider. Currently this procedure is already used in many schools. But, in addition to this, they are also put through a test. So my area of exploration is what could be other alternatives that can be used.

At the first entrance test that I attended for three year olds, I burst into tears - I wa sso overcome by the unfairness of the situation. So your piece of writing on this is an extremely necessary piece to which we must all give careful thought.

I like some of the suggestions that you have made for assessing the babies - letting them chat in an environment in which they are comfortable and observing their communication skills. The problem is that then we will expect a fair fluency in English which I am opposed to. I know the argument has been that they are going to be  instructed in English and should have communication skills in that language, but as we all know, at that age, kids pick up English like sponges and forget their mother tongue with equal haste! The only time our kids speak their mother tongue really fluently is in their pre-school time. And now the pressures of these 'entrance tests' to kindergarten, is destroying even that space. What we get are babies speaking a hybrid English and very soon adopting a derogatory attitude to the Indian regional tongues!

So I really think any assessment in English is to be avoided for babies that young.

I think three and four year olds should NOT HAVE ANY HIGH STAKE SELECTION procedures at all. These cause permanent damage! I know of parents who feel unkindly towards their babies for having wept and refused to enter the entrance test rooms! Even if this is a passing feeling, it conveys as a permanent impression to the child and  is to be avoided by institutions if they pride themselves on a humane and child-centric education.  

My suggestion is - take all the applications you like - give each a number token and shuffle the tokens in a bag and take a lottery - the first twenty or thirty or whatever the class size is, is accepted.  

How is that for fairness? We cannot choose the kind of kids that are born to us - so why choose the kids we want in our schools?

 

 

 

Those were some thought provoking ideas linked to the article. I agree that we cannot penalise a child on the basis of not being able to use 'English' as the medium for communication. We definetly need to keep that open ended.

The second suggestion linked to picking tokens sounds fair enough and quite an idealistic situation to be in, where the process of selection would be based purely on your luck. Well, I guess these are areas and methods that educational institutions need to very seriously look into and consider new forms that have been suggested. Looking forward to some more views linked to this area as it would help to have different perspectives and then analyse the methods based on its effectiveness and practicality.

The school wants to prabably screen out the kind of gentry entering the school. In so doing they try to do away with the so called troublesome parents. I do not subscribe to this, on the contrary I feel that it is up to the school  and their teaching program, to see how they mould the children of their school. If every school wants to induct 'intilligent' children, where is the challenge to their teachers? What type of children does the curriculum cater to?

I have been a part of the screening process, called admission tests, and have been extremely disheartened to see that parents have even slapped the child before he enters the room where he

is questioned. It is a very unkind thing to do. But you have to listen to the woes of parents too. In small cities where there are only a handful of good schools, the frustration of the parent is understandable. There should be some sort of regulation for new admissions where the child does not need to go for tuition classes before the test, and the atmosphere is child friendly, where the child does not feel pressurised at all. Besides seeing the tension of parents and also the unfair standards some schools resort to for admissions, the courts of our cuontry are seriously looking into the matter. I think a regulation has been passed where the child need not be questioned at all. So in that case I guess the token way does sound fair and feasable.

I think the lottery system is a good idea, but then as the other comment pointed out, there is an issue with supply and demand. How do we reconcile these issues? As for the issue of the parent profile, the only reason to look at that would be to make sure there is a balance of people from different backgrounds, so that the school does not cater to just one particular type - if a school wants a truly mixed, secular group in terms of religion, socio-economic status, professions and such.

I agree with you Varni, on the fact that admission tests coupled with a handful of good schools makes it a very awkward situation for both parents and the school management to be. I guess it is not easy for both concerned parties with a relatively high population in India to find an easy solution to this mammoth problem. I also feel we have progressed with time and people have begun to lay a high level of emphasis on education. Thank God, we also find a number of parents of the lower and middle income group struggling and sacrificing to ensure the best education for their children, even if they have not had this privilege.  But as a teacher I value that sacrifice and would hope that such efforts are recognised by many institutions and their children are given admission with minimum stress and difficulty. I was wondering if the solution is as simple as picking lots, I am sure many a great educationalists would have come up with this proposal and tried it.However, I feel that this problem goes beyond the preview of the current discussion. We are looking at lack of adequate good educational institutions, which poses an overburden on the limited ones that exist. So, what can we as a teaching community do to make a difference? Can we go beyond our own institutions and offer to share some of the good teaching practices with other institutions. The time has come in India to emphasize on greater interaction between institutions- work on a collaborative basis, that we often stress with students in the classrooms.We certainly have many teachers who are currently doing a lot of good work in the field of education. But this lacunae needs to be filled. The need of the hour is in Bruce Joyce's phrase ' crack the walls of privatism', encouraging teachers to work in collegiality and collaboration and improve their expertise as a community. This may go a long way in removing the stress on few schools, parents and children most of all.